Doodle tanks germany friction clutch12/21/2023 ![]() ![]() ![]() There are also major advantages, not the least of which being volume. This is primarily because an electrical drive system has far fewer moving parts and bearing surfaces than a mechanical system. An electrical transmission offered the designer a significant freeing up of the internal layout of an armored vehicle, as the drive motors did not have to be next to the engine, and the ability to deliver continuous, reliable power in preference to mechanical systems. The potential of electrical drive systems for tanks was recognized and experimented upon as far back as WW1. By this time, the second phase was already underway, with an expected conclusion date in the latter half of 1985 followed by another report and, starting in the middle of 1986, Phase III running through into the start of 1987. In the end, the report on this phase was finished in July 1984 and then published in January 1985. The timetable for the project called for Phase I to be concluded by the end of 1984. General Dynamics Advanced Hybrid Electric Drive (AHED) 8 x 8. It also had an Advanced Hybrid Electric Drive (AHED) 8 x 8 vehicle in the 20-ton class using lithium-ion batteries. It also had possession of a 6 x 6 wheeled, 15-ton (13.6 tonnes) Electric Vehicle Test Bed (EVTB) it had paid for itself in order to test and validate electric drive. General Dynamics had actually been looking into the potential of electric drive systems as early as 1981, producing electric-drive concept vehicles for various other vehicle projects. Phase III: A parametric study and evaluation with a selection of 3 recommended concepts for further consideration.Phase II: Generation of concept vehicles with electric drive.Phase I: A survey of existing technology (document JU-84-04057-002).Work on a future electric drive combat vehicle was to consist of three phases of work: Despite the billions of dollars spent, to date, the US military has yet to capitalize on the potential of electric-drive vehicles. To this day, in 2020, the M2 Bradley remains in service with a conventional power plant along with numerous other armored vehicles in the US inventory. However, like so many other studies, this work faded away and the design work was abandoned. What it actually generated was the realization that electric-drive fighting vehicles were not only possible but had some valuable features worth exploring, especially with regards to a series of heavy IFV platforms. The goal was roughly that of evaluating the ‘new’ (electric drive for vehicles predates armored vehicles themselves) technology available across a variety of platforms for what it may offer for further development. This contract was given the number DAAE07-84-C-RO16 and was divided into 2 phases – a third phase was added later under contract modification P00006. The US Army’s Tank Automotive Command (TACOM) issued a contract to General Dynamics Land Systems for this project – to evaluate existing electric drive technologies to use in future vehicles. As part of the evaluation of trends in future vehicles, a commission was formed to look into the potential for electric drive systems for a 40-ton (36.3 tonnes) (tank) and 19.5-ton (17.7 tonnes) (APC/IFV) platform. In 1984, the US military was considering the problems connected with a new range of vehicles, such as the M1 Abrams main battle tank and the M2 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |